Etcher Vs Rufus. Looking to try out multiple Linux distros without having to use too many DVDs. Etcher supports the persistent storage allowing live SD card or USB flash drive to be used as a hard drive. + Etcher copies images to drives byte by byte, without doing any transformation to the final device, which means images that require special treatment to be made bootable, like Windows images, will.
It has been designed to allow you to easily and comfortably burn ISO images to USB drives and SD cards. I don't know which one to use, Rufus or Etcher. Rufus is not available for Linux but there are plenty of alternatives that runs on Linux with similar functionality.
The most popular Linux alternative is UNetbootin.
I don't know which one to use, Rufus or Etcher.
Are there other good programs to use besides Rufus and Etcher? Compare Etcher and Rufus and decide which is better. Looking to try out multiple Linux distros without having to use too many DVDs.